Government Debt

in

The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy

Stephani Kelton

Argues:
A country that issues its own currency (like the US, UK, Japan, etc.) cannot unintentionally run out of money.
The real constraint on government spending is inflation, not debt.

Economist Stephanie Kelton’s core argument is that government debt and deficits are not inherently bad. For nations with a sovereign, fiat currency (like the US, UK, Japan, and Canada), Kelton argues that the government cannot go broke, debt is not a burden on future generations, and deficits are actually necessary to grow the private sector’s wealth. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Kelton explains this premise through Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which outlines several key arguments regarding why government debt can be a force for good: [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Government is Not a Household
  • Issuers vs. Users: Unlike households or private businesses that must earn money before they spend it, a sovereign government issues the currency. [1]
  • Creator of Money: The government spends first by creating money digitally and collects taxes later to remove money from the economy. [1]
  • Bankruptcy is Impossible: Because the national debt is owed in the government’s own currency, it can never default and checks will never bounce. [1, 2]
Deficits Create Wealth for the Rest of Us
  • Sectoral Balances: The core accounting principle of MMT shows that a government’s deficit (spending more than it taxes) is exactly equal to the surplus (profit and savings) of the non-government sector. [1, 2]
  • Fueling Savings: If the government were to eliminate its deficit entirely, the private sector would lose its ability to accumulate net savings. [1]
  • Funding Public Goods: Debt is good when it is used to invest in real assets like education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which improves the long-term capacity of the economy. [1]
Inflation is the Real Limit, Not the Deficit
  • Debunking Scarcity: Kelton argues that politicians use “how will we pay for it?” as a myth to avoid funding important public programs.
  • Real Constraints: The only limit on government spending is not a lack of money, but a lack of real resources.
  • The Danger of Overspending: If the government tries to buy more goods and services than the economy can produce, it causes inflation. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Taxes Are for Control, Not Revenue
  • Adjusting Demand: According to Kelton, taxes are not needed to pay for government programs.
  • Fighting Inflation: The main purpose of taxation is to reduce the spending power of the private sector, which helps cool down inflation. [1, 2]
If you are interested in diving deeper, we can explore:
  • How Kelton’s framework addresses the fear of runaway inflation.
  • The concept of the Federal Job Guarantee in MMT.
  • How this economic philosophy applies to Eurozone countries compared to the US. [1, 2]

 

 

 

 

Critics of Stephanie Kelton and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) argue that treating debt as harmless is dangerous. They claim her framework underestimates inflation, risks political abuse, and could destabilize global markets. [1, 2, 3]
Here are the primary arguments against her views:
1. It Risks Hyperinflation [1, 2]
  • Lacks Practical Controls: Critics like former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers argue that printing money to fund massive deficits inevitably leads to runaway inflation.
  • Political Impossibility: MMT suggests raising taxes to cool down an overheating economy. Economists point out that politicians will rarely vote to raise taxes on constituents, making inflation control impossible in reality. [1, 2]
2. It Ignores Supply Limits
  • Crowding Out Resources: Mainstream economists argue that when the government spends limitlessly, it bids against private businesses for labor and materials.
  • Reduced Efficiency: This “crowding out” effect can lead to shortages and less efficient allocation of resources by bureaucrats instead of free markets.
3. It Threatens the Currency’s Value
  • Loss of Confidence: Critics argue that if a government prints money endlessly, international investors will lose faith in that currency.
  • Devaluation: This loss of trust can trigger a rapid collapse in the currency’s value, spiking the cost of imported goods and hurting citizens.
4. It Is Not Globally Applicable
  • Rich Nation Bias: Opponents note that Kelton’s theories only function for dominant economies like the United States.
  • Developing Nations: Developing countries that borrow in foreign currencies (like US dollars) or rely heavily on imports cannot use MMT without triggering immediate economic collapse.
5. It Misunderstands Interest Rates [1]
  • Debt Servicing Costs: Mainstream financial experts emphasize that as debt rises, central banks may be forced to hike interest rates to curb inflation.
  • Budget Strain: Higher interest rates drastically increase the cost of servicing existing debt, potentially consuming a massive portion of future government budgets. [1, 2]

 

 

 

=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Ha-Joon Chang political economy challenges standard textbook orthodoxy through several key pillars: [1, 2]

1. Kicking Away the Ladder
Chang argues that rich countries used protective tariffs and government subsidies to build their industries. Once they became wealthy, these nations advocated for “free trade” to prevent poorer countries from using the same protective measures to compete. [1, 2, 3]
2. The Developmental State
He champions state-led economic planning, using his native South Korea as a prime example. He highlights that governments can accelerate economic growth by: [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Targeting and funding specific high-value industries.
  • Enacting trade protection until domestic businesses mature.
  • Subsidizing exports to global markets. [1, 2]
3. Pluralism Over Orthodoxy
Chang is a vocal proponent of economic pluralism. He believes students and citizens should learn a wide variety of economic theories rather than just the Neoclassical approach. [1, 2]
4. Re-evaluating Capitalism
In his bestselling book 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism, Chang disputes free-market dogma. He argues that: [1, 2]
  • The internet was developed with heavy government funding, not purely by free enterprise.
  • The richest countries (like the United States) often have the most regulated, not the freest, labor markets.
  • Executive compensation has become detached from performance and driven by financial short-termism. [1]
5. Institutions Over Free Markets
Chang argues that markets cannot function properly without robust legal and political institutions. Economic development is more than just removing government regulations; it requires structural foundations like strong public education, labor rights, and central banking. [1, 2, 3]

 

 

Loading